Application of blockchain and IOT in supply chain management
a case study on traceability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v23i3.5016Keywords:
Blockchain, IoT, TraceabilityAbstract
The article looks at the application of Blockchain technology and the Internet of Things (IoT) in waste management and recycling startups, with a focus on improving traceability in the supply chain. The central objective of the research was to analyze how these technologies could improve traceability and the operations of startups, considering both their benefits and the challenges inherent in their implementation. To achieve this objective, the study adopted a qualitative approach and carried out a case study involving eight selected startups. The companies sought to increase packaging recycling rates by adopting sustainable practices, fair pay for collectors and adequate training. In addition, they practiced green urban mining, collecting post-consumer waste in urban environments. The research revealed that the combination of Blockchain and IoT made it possible to track waste in real time, from its origin to its final destination, guaranteeing reliability, security and transparency in operations. The integration of these technologies also made it possible to generate certificates and documentation using Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) in reverse logistics. Challenges included lack of knowledge and integration with stakeholders, as well as restrictions on client servers for the implementation of Smart Contracts.The study highlighted the effectiveness of Blockchain and IoT in improving traceability and emphasized the benefits, such as greater transparency and reliability.
Downloads
References
ABED, S. et al. An analysis and evaluation of lightweight hash functions for blockchain-based IoT devices. Cluster computing, v. 24, n. 4, p. 3065–3084, 2021.
ABEYRATNE, S.; MONFARED, R. Blockchain ready manufacturing supply chain using distributed ledger. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, London, pp. 1-10, 2016
ACCENTURE. 2018.Improving the way the world works and lives. Disponível em: https://www.accenture.com/content/dam/accenture/final/a-com-migration/pdf/accenture/redesign-assets/dotcom/documents/global/1/Accenture-Corporate-Citizenship-Report-2018.pdf. Acesso em: 19 set. 2023.
ALAGUMALAI, A. et al. Machine learning in biohydrogen production: a review. Biofuel Research Journal, v. 10, n. 2, p. 1844-1858, 2023.
ALMADA, P. E. R.; COSTA, E. S. Controle e vigilância no capitalismo digital: uma análise da tecnologia blockchain e sua implementação empresarial. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, v. 21, p. e2022-0020, 2023.
ARKIN, H.; COLTON, R. R. Tables for Statisticians. 2. ed. Nova York: Barnes & Noble. 1971.
ASLAM, Javed et al. Factors influencing blockchain adoption in supply chain management practices: A study based on the oil industry. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, v. 6, n. 2, p. 124-134, 2021.
AZIM, M. I. et al. Peer-to-peer kilowatt and negawatt trading: A review of challenges and recent advances in distribution networks. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 169, n. 112908, p. 112908, 2022.
BIAZZI, L. F. S. Logística reversa: o que é realmente e como é gerenciada. São Paulo: USP, 2002.
BURITE, Alexsandro Souza; SACRAMENTO, Ana Rita Silva; RAUPP, Fabiano Maury. Possíveis Implicações da Aplicação Combinada da Blockchain, Smart Contract e Inteligência Artificial nas Contratações e no Orçamento Público. Revista da CGU, v. 15, n. 27, 2023.
CAI, Carrie J. et al. " Hello AI": uncovering the onboarding needs of medical practitioners for human-AI collaborative decision-making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-computer Interaction, v. 3, n. CSCW, p. 1-24, 2019.
CÂNDIDO, Gustavo. Cadeia de suprimentos e processos. São Paulo: Editora Senac, 2023.
CAPGEMINI CONSULTING. 2017. Disponível em: https://www.capgemini.com/consulting-de/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2017/08/cc_agile_organization_pov_20170508.pdf. Acesso em: 19 set. 2023.
CAPGEMINI CONSULTING. 2018.Disponível em: https://www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Capgemini-World-Wealth-Report.pdf. Acesso em: 19 set. 2023.
CHANG, C. H.; LAI, P. L. An evaluation of logistics policy enablers between Taiwan and the UK. Maritime business review, v. 2, n. 1, p. 2–20, 2017.
CORBIN, J.; STRAUSS, A. Basics of qualitative research. 4 ed. Nova Deli, India: SAGE, 2014.
CRUZ, T. Sistemas de Informações Gerenciais e Operacionais - Tecnologias da Informação e as Organizações do Século 21. 5 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Atlas, 2019.
DE VRIES, Alex. Cryptocurrencies on the road to sustainability: Ethereum paving the way for Bitcoin. Patterns, v. 4, n. 1, 2023.
DELOITTE. 2018. A new mindset for action 2018 Global Impact Report. Disponível em: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/About-Deloitte/deloitte-2018-global-impact-report.pdf. Acesso em: 19 set. 2023.
DEWAN, A.; PETTERSSON, H.; CROKER, N. As governments fumbled their coronavirus response, these four got it right. Here's how. CNN, 2020.
ENGELMANN, Wilson; CANTALI, Fernanda Borghetti; SIMÕES, Isabelle de Zorzi Maya. Smart contracts: Uso da tecnologia blockchain para garantia da eficácia dos acordos celebrados. Revista Direito em Debate, v. 32, n. 59, p. e10488-e10488, 2023.
FORRESTER. 2018. Emerging Technology Projection: The Total Economic ImpactTM Of IBM Blockchain. Projected Cost Savings and Business Benefits Enabled By IBM Blockchain. Disponível em: https://tools.totaleconomicimpact.com/go/ibm/blockchainTEI/. Acesso em: 19 set. 2023.
GAI, R. et al. A summary of the research on the foundation and application of blockchain technology. Journal of physics. Conference series, v. 1693, n. 1, p. 012025, 2020.
GAO, S.; MISHNE, G.; SCHEINOST, D. Poincaré embedding reveals edge-based functional networks of the brain. In: MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVENTION – MICCAI 2020. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. p. 448–457.
GARTNER SURVEY REVEALS THE SCARCITY OF CURRENT BLOCKCHAIN DEPLOYMENTS. Disponível em: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2018-05-03-gartner-survey-reveals-the-scarcity-of-current-blockchain-developments. Acesso em: 19 set. 2023.
GIESE, E. C. et al. Cooperativas e a gestão de resíduos eletroeletrônicos. [s.l.] CETEM/MCTI, 2021.
GRANT, D. Gestão de logística e cadeia de suprimentos. Saraiva Educação SA, 2013.
GUAN, W.-J. et al. Clinical characteristics of Coronavirus disease 2019 in China. The New England journal of medicine, v. 382, n. 18, p. 1708–1720, 2020.
HACKIUS, N; PETERSEN, M. Blockchain in logistics and supply chain: trick or treat?. In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE HAMBURG INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF LOGISTICS (HICL), epubli, 2017. p. 3-18.
HUO, R. et al. A comprehensive survey on blockchain in industrial internet of things: Motivations, research progresses, and future challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, v. 24, n. 1, p. 88–122, 2022.
ITO, J.; NARULA, N.; ALI, R. The blockchain will do to the financial system what the internet did to media. Harvard business review, 2017.
JOÃO, B. N. Blockchain e o Potencial de Novos Negócios: Uma Revisão Sistemática da Literatura. In: Encontro da Associação Nacional dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Administração, Curitiba, Anais [...], Curitiba, EnANPAD, 2018.
KAMBLE, S.; GUNASEKARAN, A.; DHONE, N. C. Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organisational performance in Indian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, p. 1-19, 2019.
KOTSIOPOULOS, Thanasis et al. Machine learning and deep learning in smart manufacturing: The smart grid paradigm. Computer Science Review, v. 40, p. 100341, 2021.
LATIF, R. M. A. et al. Retail level Blockchain transformation for product supply chain using truffle development platform. Cluster computing, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1–16, 2021.
LI, Meng et al. Blockchain-enabled secure energy trading with verifiable fairness in industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, v. 16, n. 10, p. 6564-6574, 2020.
LIMA, M. I. A; SANTOS, D. L; BEZERRA, T. M. O; SILVA, A. P. S; PEDROSA, L. B; SANTOS, G. L. S; PADOVAM, I. S. “Cara a cara com a célula”: o jogo como agente facilitador na aprendizagem de citologia. In: CONGRESSO NORDESTINO DE BIÓLOGOS, v. 6, Anais [...], Congrebio, 2016.
LIU, A. et al. Blockchain-based customization towards decentralized consensus on product requirement, quality, and price. Manufacturing letters, v. 27, p. 18–25, 2021.
LU, W.; WU, L.; XUE, F. Blockchain technology for projects: A multicriteria decision matrix. Project management journal, v. 53, n. 1, p. 84–99, 2022.
MELOTTI, L. M. D. et al. Utilização do Sistema Blockchain e sua Rastreabilidade no Agronegócio. Cadernos de Prospecção, v. 16, n. 5, p. 1543-1554, 2023.
MORRIS, N. KPMG: US 2018 blockchain venture capital investment $858m. Disponível em: https://www.ledgerinsights.com/kpmg-2018-blockchain-venture-capital-investment/. Acesso em: 19 set. 2023.
MOZUMDER, Md Ariful Islam et al. Overview: Technology roadmap of the future trend of metaverse based on IoT, blockchain, AI technique, and medical domain metaverse activity. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICACT), 24., 2022, IEEE, 2022. p. 256-261.
NYLAND, J. J. A. O. L.; BADEJO, M. S.; CORRÊA, R. G. F. Blockchain application for traceability and olive oil production in Brazil. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, v. 17, n. 8, 2023.
OLIVEIRA, E.; FREITAS, A. Os porquês da tecnologia blockchain ainda não ter sido popularizada: um ensaio teórico. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, v. 20, n. 1, p. 332–343, 2020.
PAIVA GOMES, D.; PAIVA GOMES, E.; CONRADO, P. C. Criptoativos, Tokenização, Blockchain e Metaverso. 1 ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2022.
PANCARI, S. et al. A Systematic Comparison between the Ethereum and Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain Platforms for Attribute-Based Access Control in Smart Home IoT Environments. Sensors, v. 23, n. 16, p. 7046, 2023.
QI, W.; YAN, Y.; GONG, Y.; LIU, D.; DUAN, N.; CHEN, J.; ZHANG, R.; ZHOU, M. Prophetnet: Predicting future n-gram for sequence-to-sequence pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04063, 2020.
RAHMAN, A. et al. Smartblock-sdn: An optimized blockchain-sdn framework for resource management in iot. IEEE Access, v. 9, p. 28361–28376, 2021.
RAHMAN, Md Shafiur et al. A survey of blockchain-based IoT eHealthcare: Applications, research issues, and challenges. Internet of Things, v. 19, p. 100551, 2022.
REJEB, A. et al. The Internet of Things and the circular economy: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Journal of cleaner production, v. 350, n. 131439, p. 131439, 2022.
SWAN, M. Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. Bombaim, India: Shroff Publishers & Distributors, 2015.
TIAN, Y. et al. The future of blockchain-enabled tokenization in infrastructure investment and development: A Delphi-based scenario analysis. Disponível em: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2208/2208.04710.pdf. Acesso em: 19 set. 2023.
VASAN, K.; JANOSOV, M.; BARABÁSI, A.-L. Quantifying NFT-driven networks in crypto art. Scientific reports, v. 12, n. 1, 2022.
WANG, Y. Designing a blockchain enabled supply chain. IFAC-PapersOnLine, v. 52, n. 13, p. 6–11, 2019.
XU, B. et al. Automated cattle counting using Mask R-CNN in quadcopter vision system. Computers and electronics in agriculture, v. 171, n. 105300, p. 105300, 2020.
YIN, R. K. Pesquisa Qualitativa do Início ao Fim. 1 ed. Porto Alegre: Penso, 2016.
YU, T.; HUANG, J.; CHANG, Q. Optimizing task scheduling in human-robot collaboration with deep multi-agent reinforcement learning. Journal of manufacturing systems, v. 60, p. 487–499, 2021.
YUAN, R. et al. Shadow Eth: Private smart contract on public blockchain. Journal of computer science and technology, v. 33, n. 3, p. 542–556, 2018.
ZHANG, Yuanyuan et al. On the market efficiency and liquidity of high-frequency cryptocurrencies in a bull and bear market. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, v. 13, n. 1, p. 8, 2020.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Produção Online
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Journal reserves the right to make spelling and grammatical changes, aiming to keep a default language, respecting, however, the style of the authors.
The published work is responsibility of the (s) author (s), while the Revista Produção Online is only responsible for the evaluation of the paper. The Revista Produção Online is not responsible for any violations of Law No. 9.610 / 1998, the Copyright Act.
The journal allows the authors to keep the copyright of accepted articles, without restrictions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License .
