A proposal for a theoretical framework for project management maturity assessment
focus on technical-management and behavioral aspects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v23i1.4820Keywords:
Project Management Maturity Model, Maturity Model AssessmentAbstract
This study aims to offer a proposal for a theoretical model for evaluating project management, capable of narrowing a gap observed in the literature with regard to the reconciliation of technical-administrative practices with behavioral aspects. In methodological terms, we employ the Cochrane protocol to support the systematic review. The data were obtained from the Web of Science, Scopus and SciELO databases. We found evidence of gaps in the models and standards of project management maturity, since although projects are carried out by and for people, the behavioral aspects have not been adequately examined. As a contribution, we propose a theoretical framework to support the investigation of project management maturity that conciliates technical-managerial and behavioral aspects.
Downloads
References
AKERS, J.; AGUIAR-IBÁÑEZ, R.; BABA-AKBARI, A. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 2009. Disponível em: https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf
ALBRECHT, Jan Christoph; SPANG, Konrad. Disassembling and Reassembling Project Management Maturity. Project Management Journal, v. 47, n. 5, p. 18–35, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281604700503
ANANTATMULA, Vittal S.; RAD, Parviz F. Role of Organizational Project Management Maturity Factors on Project Success. Engineering Management Journal, v. 30, n. 3, p. 165–178, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2018.1458208
ARAUJO, F. O. et al. Contribuições das Escolas de Engenharia para o desenvolvimento social inclusivo: um levantamento sistemático da literatura. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ENGENHARIA E DESENVOLVIMENTO – ENEDS, 13., Florianópolis, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14488/enegep2020_tn_sto_346_1778_39595
BERSSANETI, Fernando Tobal; CARVALHO, Marly Monteiro De; MUSCAT, Antonio Rafael Namur. O impacto de fatores críticos de sucesso e da maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos no desempenho: um levantamento com empresas brasileiras. Production, v. 26, n. 4, p. 707–723, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.065012
CAMPOS, Marina Costa; DANTAS, Anderson De Barros; DA SILVA, Luciana Santos Costa Vieira; et al. Avaliação de Maturidade em Gestão de Projetos na Universidade Federal de Alagoas utilizando o Método Prado-MMGP. Revista de Gestão e Projetos, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1–16, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/gep.v11i1.15870
COOKE-DAVIES, T. J.; FAPM, F. Measurement of organizational maturity. Innovations-Project management research, p. 211-28. 2004.
SILVEIRA, Gutenberg De Araújo; SBRAGIA, Roberto; KRUGLIANSKAS, Isak. Fatores condicionantes do nível de maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos: um estudo empírico em empresas brasileiras. Revista de Administração, v. 48, n. 3, p. 574–591, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1107
CARVALHO, M. M.; LAURINDO, F. J.; DE PAULA PESSOA, M. Information Technology Project management to achieve efficiency in Brazilian Companies. In: Managing globally with information technology, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1107
SOUZA, Talita Ferreira De; GOMES, Carlos Francisco Simões. Assessment of Maturity in Project Management: A Bibliometric Study of Main Models. Procedia Computer Science, v. 55, p. 92–101, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.012
PISTILLO FERNANDES, Gabriel Francisco; GARCEZ, Marcos Paixão. Contribuição da maturidade da gestão de projetos para a geração de vantagem competitiva em empresas de telecomunicações. Revista de Gestão e Projetos, v. 10, n. 2, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5585/GeP.v10i2.10574
FREUND, J.; JONES, J. Measuring and managing information risk: a FAIR approach. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2014. DOI: https://www.fairinstitute.org/fair-book
GONÇALVES, Elton Fernandes; DRUMOND, Geisa Meirelles; MÉXAS, Mirian Picinini. Evaluation of PMBOK and scrum practices for software development in the vision of specialists. Independent Journal of Management & Production, v. 8, n. 5, p. 569–582, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v8i5.598
GUEDES, V. L.; BORSCHIVER, S. Bibliometria: uma ferramenta estatística para a gestão da informação e do conhecimento, em sistemas de informação, de comunicação e de avaliação científica e tecnológica. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO, v. 6, n. 1, 18, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18225/9788570131485.cap14
GREEN, Sally; HIGGINS, Julian Pt. Preparing a Cochrane Review. In: HIGGINS, Julian Pt; GREEN, Sally (Orgs.). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008, p. 11–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712184.ch2
INTERNATIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION. IPMA OCB, Organizational Competence Baseline. IPMA, 2013.
IRFAN, M.; HASSAN, M.; HASSAN, N.; HABIB, M.; KHAN, S.; NASRUDDIN, A. M. Project management maturity and organizational reputation: A case study of public sector organizations. IEEE Access, 8, 73828-73842. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988511
Jucá Junior, A. D. S., Conforto, E. C., Amaral, D. C. (2010). Maturidade em gestão de projetos em pequenas empresas desenvolvedoras de software do Polo de Alta Tecnologia de São Carlos. Gestão & Produção, 17, 181-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2010000100014
JUNIOR, J. T. P.; DO CARMO SATLLER, T.; PEREIRA, A. G.; SILVA, L. C. A importância de um escritório de gerenciamento de projetos em uma organização. Revista Produção Online, v. 21, n. 2, p. 353-371, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v21i2.3586
KERZNER, H. Project management 2.0: leveraging tools, distributed collaboration, and metrics for project success International Institute for Learning.–Hoboken, New Jersey, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118826751
KERZNER, H. Strategic planning for project management using a project management maturity model. John Wiley & Sons, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119559078.app
KERZNER, H. Using the project management maturity model: strategic planning for project management. John Wiley & Sons, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119559078.app
LIANYING, Zhang; JING, He; XINXING, Zhang. The Project Management Maturity Model and Application Based on PRINCE2. Procedia Engineering, v. 29, p. 3691–3697, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.554
PAULK, M. C. A history of the capability maturity model for software. ASQ Software Quality Professional, v. 12, n. 1, p. 5-19, 2009.
PRADO, D. Maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos. (Vol. 7). Falconi Editora. 2016.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). Project Management Inst. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/9789634545019
RABECHINI JR., Roque; PESSÔA, Marcelo Schneck De Paula. Um modelo estruturado de competências e maturidade em gerenciamento de projetos. Production, v. 15, n. 1, p. 34–43, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132005000100004
SCHLICHTER, J.; FRIEDRICH, R.; HAECK, B. The history of OPM3. In: PMI’s Global Congress Europe. 2003.
TOLEDO GANDARIAS, Nerea; OTEGI OLASO, Jose Ramon. A novel method for strategic decision making based on project management maturity. DYNA, v. 94, n. 1, p. 75–81, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6036/8762
VIANA, Joana Coelho; MOTA, Caroline Maria De Miranda. Enhancing Organizational Project Management Maturity: a framework based on the value focused thinking model. Production, v. 26, n. 2, p. 313–329, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.169913
VLADIMIROVNA, K. I. Organizational project management in Omsk region companies: current state and development constraints. Экономика региона, v.14, n. 1, p. 69-78. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17059/2018–1–6 UDC 338
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Produção Online
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Journal reserves the right to make spelling and grammatical changes, aiming to keep a default language, respecting, however, the style of the authors.
The published work is responsibility of the (s) author (s), while the Revista Produção Online is only responsible for the evaluation of the paper. The Revista Produção Online is not responsible for any violations of Law No. 9.610 / 1998, the Copyright Act.
The journal allows the authors to keep the copyright of accepted articles, without restrictions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License .
