Application of the method titled kitchen dynamic in production management classroom

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v19i4.3422

Keywords:

Simultaneous Engineering. Engineering Teaching. Engineer Skills. Decision Making. Multidisciplinary Engineering.

Abstract

According to engineering students and the Resolution of the National Council of Education – Ministry of Education from Brazil (CNE/CES 11 – March 11, 2002), the engineer, to practice engineering, must have skills and competences like: communication; clarity and conciseness; argumentative; self-learning; teamwork; decision making and analyse data among others. Despite this, some of them, are not stimulated during some engineering courses. As a propose to encourage the students to exercise some of them, this work presents a dynamic titled Kitchen Dynamic. This dynamics is based on work groups, which should propose an industrial restaurant menu with main course, soup, salad, garnish, dessert and juice. In the beginning of the first stage of the dynamic, the students of each group receive only one information about every available item (calories, costs, acceptance and time-difficulty to make it) for proposing and presenting their menu. After that the moderator clarifies the similarity between the Kitchen Dynamic and organizational structure of industry. Finally the moderator encourages the students to discuss about that. In the second stage of the dynamic, the groups are mixed, for that every new group have at least one student from every groups of first stage. At the end of this stage the groups present their menu and a new round of discussions takes place. The results, obtained by feedback from the students soon after the dynamic, showed that the Kitchen Dynamic stimulated their participation reflection and discussions of the results, what is important to the students develop skills and competences needed to engineers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Antonio Wagner Forti, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Engenharia, Guaratinguetá.

Departamento de Mecânica

Jorge Muniz Junior, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Engenharia, Guaratinguetá.

Departamento de Produção

References

BRINT, S.; CANTWELL, A. M.; HANNEMAN, R. A.The two cultures of undergraduate academic engagement. Research in Higher Education, v. 49, p. 383-403, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9090-y

DYM, C. L. Design, Systems, and Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education, v. 20, n.3, p. 305-312, 2004.

ELLIS, R. A.; GOODYEAR, P.; CALVO, R. A.; PROSSER, M. Engineering students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning through discussions in face-to-face and online contexts. Learning and Instructions, v. 18, p. 267-282, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.06.001

ENADE, 2017. Provas e gabritos. Disponível em: http://portal.inep.gov.br/web/guest/provas-e-gabaritos3. Acesso em 30 set. 2018.

GUIMARÃES, E. M. P.; ÉVORA, Y. D. M. Sistema de informação: instrumento para tomada de decisão no exercício da gerência. Ci. Inf., Brasília, v. 33, n. 1, p. 72-80, jan./abr. 2004. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ci/v33n1/v33n1a09. Acesso em: 30 set. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-19652004000100009

HWANG, G.; CHANG, H.A Formative Assessment-Based Mobile Learning Approach to Improving the Learning Atitudes and Achivements of Students. Computer and Education, v. 56, p. 1023-1031, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002

JACKSON, L.; MEYER, W.; PARKINSON, J. A Study of the Writing Tasks and Reading Assigned to Undergraduate Science Students at a South African University. English for Specific Purposes, v. 25, p. 260–281, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.003

KEMBER, D., LEUNG, D. P., McNAUGHT, C. A Workshop Activity to Demonstrate that Approaches to Learning are Influenced by the Teaching and Learning Environment. Active Learning in Higher Education, v. 9, n. 1, p.43–56, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407086745

LANG, J. D., CRUSE, S., McVEY, F. D., McMASTERS, J. Industry Expectations of New Engineers: A Survey to Assist Curriculum Designers. Journal of Engineering Education, v. 88, n. 1, p. 43-51,1999. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00410.x

LIMA, B.P.; MUNIZ JUNIOR, J.; FORTI, A.W. Projeto de embalagens para peças de automotivas aplicando o desdobramento da função qualidade (QFD). Revista Gestão Industrial, v. 8, n. 3, p. 126-141, 2012. Disponível em: https://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/revistagi/article/view/1058/870. Acesso em: 30 set. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3895/S1808-04482012000300006

LUJAN, H. L.; DiCARLO, S. E. Too Much Teaching, not enough Learning: what is the soluction? Advances in Psychology Education, v. 30, p. 17-22, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00061.2005

MARCH, E.; GAFFNEY, J. S. Relational Identities of Students, Families, and Educators. Remedial and Special Education, v. 31, n. 1, p. 3-16, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324393

MARTIN, R.; MAYTHAM, B.; CASE, J.; FRASER, D. Engineering graduates’ perceptions of how well they were prepared for work in industry. European Journal of Engineering Education, v. 30, n. 2, p.167–180, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790500087571

MESQUITA, D., LIMA, R. M.; PEREIRA, G. Engenharia e Gestão Industrial em Portugal: Uma Visão da Procura Profissional. In: CONGRESSO LUSO-MOÇAMBICANO DE ENGENHARIA (CLME'2008), 5., 2008. Moçambique: Maputo, [Anais…] Moçambique: Maputo, 2008.

MINISTÉRIO DA EDUCAÇÃO E CULTURA (MEC), Conselho Nacional de Educação – Câmara de Educação Superior. Resolução CNE/CES 11, de 11 de Março de 2002. Brasília, 2002. Disponível em: http://portal.mec.gov.br/index.php?option=com_docman&view=download&alias=15766-rces011-02&category_slug=junho-2014-pdf&Itemid=30192.

MIGUEL, P. A. C. (Org) Metodologia de pesquisa em engenharia de produção e gestão de operações. 2. Ed. São Paulo: Campus, 2012.

MOHAN, A; MERLE, D.; JACKSON, C.; LANNIN, J. NAIR, S.S. Professional Skills in the Engineering Curriculum. IEEE Transactions on Education, v. 53, n. 4, p. 562-571, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2009.2033041

MONTERO, E.; GONZÁLEZ, M. J. Student Engagement in a Structured Problem-Based Approach to Learning: A First-Year Eletronic Engineering Study Module on Heat Transfer. IEEE Transaction on Education, v. 52, n. 2, p. 214-221, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2008.924219

MUNIZ Jr., J. Gestão de Projetos e Engenharia Simultânea. Video Aula UNIVESP. Disponível em: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Stgyry24_kE. Acessado em: 30/09/2018. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x1172-15

MUNIZ Jr., J.; DELAMARO, M. C.; SALOMON, SALOMON, V. A. P.; CARVALHO, R.; FREIRE Jr., J. C, HATAKEYAMA, K.; SAMED, M. M. A. Reflexões sobre evasão e a retenção principalmente nas primeiras séries dos cursos de engenharia de produção. In: Oliveira, V. F.; Cavenaghi, V.; Másculo F. S.. (Org.). Tópicos Emergente e desafios metodológicos em Engenharia de Produção: casos, experiências e proposições. Rio de Janeiro: ABEPRO v. 2, p. 79-87, 2009.

MUNIZ JR., J. RODRIGUES, J. S.; ASSIS, A.; OLIVEIRA, F. C. P.; FRANCO, B. C.; MACIEL, F. G. Increasing students’ skills in operations management classes: Cumbuca Method as teaching-learning strategy. Gestão da Produção, São Carlos, v. 24, n. 4, p. 680-689, Dec. 2017 . Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-530X2017000400680&lng=en&nrm=iso. Acesso em: 30 set. 2018.

PALMER, S.; HOLT, D.; BRAY, S. Does the Discussion Help? The Impact of a Formally Assessed Online Discussion on Final Student Results. British Journal of Educational Technology, v. 39, n. 5, p. 847-858, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00780.x

SAVANDER-RANNE, C.; LUNDÉN, O.; KOLARI, S. An alternative teaching method for electrical engineering courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, v. 51, n. 4, p. 423-431, 2008. <https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4475815>. Acesso em 30 set. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2007.912500

Published

2019-12-16

How to Cite

Forti, A. W., & Muniz Junior, J. (2019). Application of the method titled kitchen dynamic in production management classroom. Revista Produção Online, 19(4), 1304–1326. https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v19i4.3422

Issue

Section

Papers