Adoption of ecodesign in innovative companies in Brazil: survey and analysis of the main stimulus

Authors

  • João Victor Rojas Luiz Departamento de Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP
  • João Leonardo Andrade Departamento de Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP
  • Daniel Jugend Departamento de Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP
  • Sérgio Luis da Silva Universidade Federal de São Carlos, UFSCar
  • Octaviano Rojas Luiz Departamento de Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP
  • Fernando Bernardi Souza Departamento de Engenharia de Produção, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v17i2.2676

Keywords:

Environmental sustainability. Product development process. Ecodesign. Incentives for adoption, Survey research.

Abstract

Although concern about the environmental issues has gained prominence in the field of operations management in recent years, a research gap still exists in companies operating in Brazil. In order to contribute to this area, this research aims to explain and understand the main stimulus for the adoption of ecodesign in Brazil. To this end, a survey was carried out in 79 firms belonging to innovative sectors and involved in new product development activities. Among the main results, it was observed that compliance with legal requirements and new business opportunities stood out as the main stimulus for the adoption of ecodesign. The possibility of using ecodesign as an element of cost reduction was also a stimulus considered relevant by companies. On the other hand, the stimulus “benefit to the environment” was considered the least attractive.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AMMENBERG, J.; SUNDIN, E. Products in environmental management systems: Drivers, barriers and experiences. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 13, n. 4, p. 405 – 415, 2005. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.12.005

BABBIE, E. Métodos de pesquisas de Survey. Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 1999. 519p.

BAUMANN, H.; BOONS, F.; BRAGD, A. Mapping the green product development field: Engineering, policy and business perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 10, n. 5, p. 409–425, 2002. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00015-X

BOCKEN, N. M. P.; FARRACHO, M.; BOSWORTH, R.; KEMP, R. The front-end of eco-innovation for eco-innovative small and medium sized companies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, v. 31, p. 43 – 57, 2014. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.10.004

BORCHARDT, M.; WENDT, M.H.; SELLITO, M.A.; PEREIRA,G.M. Reprojeto do contraforte: um caso de aplicação do ecodesign em uma empresa do setor calçadista. Production, v. 20, n. 3, p. 392 403, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132010005000006

BRONES, F.; CARVALHO, M. M. From 50 to 1: integrating literature toward a systemic ecodesign model. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 96, 1, p. 44–57, 2015. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.036

BRONES, F.; DE CARVALHO, M. M.; DE SENZI ZANCUL, E. Ecodesign in project management: A missing link for the integration of sustainability in product development? Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 80, October, p. 106–118, 2014. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.088

BOVEA, M. D.; PÉREZ-BELIS, V. A taxonomy of ecodesign tools for integrating environmental requirements into the product design process. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 20, n.1 p. 61–71, 2012. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.012

BYGGETH, S.; HOCHSCHORNER, E. Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 14, n. 15-16, p. 1420–1430, 2006. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.03.024

CAUCHICK MIGUEL, P.A; HO, L. H. Levantamento tipo survey. Metodologia de pesquisa em engenharia de produção e gestão de operações. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2010. p. 73–128.

CLUZEL, F.; YANNOU, B.; MILLET, D.; LEROY, Y. Eco-ideation and eco-selection of R&D projects portfolio in complex systems industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 112, n. 5, p. 4329 – 4343, 2016. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.002

COLLADO-RUIZ, D.; OSTAD-AHMAD-GHORABI, H. Estimating environmental behavior without performing a life cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology, v. 17, n.1, p. 31–42, 2013. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00510.x

DALHAMMAR, C. Industry attitudes towards ecodesign standards for improved resource efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, v.123, n.1, p.155–166, 2016. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.035

DANGELICO, R. M. Green product innovation: where we are and where we are going. Business Strategy and the Environment, v.8, n. 25, p. 560 -576, 2015. http://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1886

DANGELICO, R. M.; PONTRANDOLFO, P.; PUJARI, D. Developing sustainable new products in the textile and upholstered furniture industries: role of external integrative capabilities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 30, n. 4, p. 642–658, 2013. http://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12013

DANGELICO, R. M.; PONTRANDOLFO, P.; PUJARI, D. Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: a sustainability-oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and Environment, in press, 2016. http://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1932

DANGELICO, R. M.; PUJARI, D. Mainstreaming green product innovation: Why and how companies integrate environmental sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 95, n. 3, p. 471–486, 2010. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0434-0

DEKONINCK, E. A.; DOMINGO, L.; O’HARE, J. A.; PIGOSSO, D.A.; REYES, T.; TROUSSIER, N. Defining the challenges for ecodesign implementation in companies: development and consolidation of a framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 135,n. 1, p. 410–425, 2016. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.045

EPPINGER, S. The fundamental challenge of product design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, v. 28, p. 399–400, 2011. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00810.x

FIKSEL, J. Design for Environment. New York: Mc Graw Hill, 1996. 432p.

FORZA, C. Survey research in operations management: a process-based perspective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management v. 22, n. 2, p. 152–194, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01443570210414310

GONZÁLEZ-BENITO, J.; GONZÁLEZ-BENITO, Ó. A review of determinant factors of environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 15, n. 2, p. 87–102, 2006. http://doi.org/10.1002/bse.450

GRAEDEL, T.E.; ALLENBY, B.R. Industrial ecology. Prentice Hall, 1995, 363p.

IBGE. PINTEC - Pesquisa de Inovação Tecnológica. Rio de Janeiro: 2013

JABBOUR, A. B. L. S; JABBOUR, C. J. C. Gestão ambiental nas organizações: fundamentos e tendências. São Paulo: Atlas, 2013. 104p.

JABBOUR, C. J. C.; JUGEND, D.; JABBUR, A.B.L.S.; GUNASEKARAN, A.; LATHAM, H. Green product development and performance of Brazilian firms: measuring the role of human and technical aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 87, p. 442–451, 2015. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.036

JOHANSSON, G. Success factor for integration of Ecodesign in product development: a review of state of the art. Environment Management and Health, Wagon Lane, v. 13, n. 1, p 98-107, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09566160210417868

KNIGHT, P.; JENKINS, J. O. Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: a practitioners perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 17, n. 5, p. 549–558, 2009. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.10.002

KUBOTA, F.S.; CAMPOS, L. M.S.; CAUCHICK MIGUEL, P.A. Uma análise preliminar das contribuições da modularidade em produto ao ecodesign. Produção on line, v.14, n. 2, p. 560-592, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v14i2.1424

LU, B.; ZHANG, J.; XUE, D.; GU, P. Systematic lifecycle design for sustainable product development. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, v19, n.4, 307-324, 2011. http://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X11424513

LUIZ, O. R.; JUGEND, D.; JABBOUR, C.J.C.; LUIZ, O., SOUZA. F. B. Ecodesign field of research throughout the world: mapping the territory by using an evolutionary lens. Scientometrics, v. 109, n.1, p. 241– 59, 2016. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2043-x

LUTTROPP, C.; LAGERSTEDT, J. EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 14, n. 15/16, p. 1396–1408, 2006. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.022

MAGNAGO, P.F.; AGUIAR, J.P.O; PAULA, I.C. Sustentabilidade em desenvolvimento de produtos: uma proposta para a classificação de abordagens. Revista Produção online, v. 12, n.2, 351-376, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v12i2.796

PIGOSSO, D. C. A.; ROZENFELD, H.; MCALOONE, T. C. Ecodesign maturity model: a management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 59,n.15, 160–173, 2013. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.040

PORTER, M.E.; VAN DER LINDE, C. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, v. 28, n. 6, p. 160-173, 1995.

POULIKIDOU, S.; BJÖRKLUND, A.; TYSKENG, S. Empirical study on integration of environmental aspects into product development: Processes, requirements and the use of tools in vehicle manufacturing companies in Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 81, n. 15, p. 34–45, 2014. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.001

PUJARI, D. Eco-innovation and new product development: Understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, v. 26, n. 1, p. 76–85, 2006. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.006

ROZENFELD, H.; FORCELLINI, F. A.; AMARAL, D. C.; TOLEDO, J. C.; SILVA, S. L.; ALLIPRANDINI, D. H.; SCALICE, R.; K. Gestão de desenvolvimento de produto: uma referência para a melhoria do processo. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2006.

SEBRAE. Critérios de classificação de empresas: EI - ME – EPP. Disponível em: http://www.sebrae-sc.com.br/leis/default.asp?vcdtexto=4154. Acessado em e julho de 2013.

SELLITO, M.A.; BORCHARDT, M; PEREIRA, G.M.; PACHECO, D.A.J. Gestão de cadeias de suprimentos verdes: quadro de trabalho. Revista Produção Online, v.13, n. 1, p. 351-374, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v13i1.1181

STANDARD, I. ISO 14006:2011 - Environmental management systems - Guidelines for incorporating ecodesign, 2011.

STEVELS, A. Integration of ecodesign into business, a new challenge. In: ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS DESIGN AND INVERSE MANUFACTURING SYMPOSIM, 1., 1999, Los Alamitos. Anais.. Los Alamitos: IEE Computer Society, 1999. p. 27-35.

VAN HEMEL, C.; CRAMER, J. Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 10, n. 5, p. 439–453, 2002. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00013-6

VARANDAS JUNIOR, A. Uma proposta para integração de aspectos ambientais do ecodesign no processo de desenvolvimento de novos produtos. Tese de doutorado. Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo, 2014.

VERCALSTEREN, A. Integrating the ecodesign concept in small and medium-size enterprises: experiences in the Flemish region of Belgium. Environmental Management and Health, v. 12, n. 4, p. 347-355, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005706

WALKER, H.; SISTOB, L.; MCBAINC, D. Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: lessons from the public and private sectors. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, v.14, n.1, p.69–85, 2008. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2008.01.007

Published

2017-06-14

How to Cite

Luiz, J. V. R., Andrade, J. L., Jugend, D., da Silva, S. L., Luiz, O. R., & Souza, F. B. (2017). Adoption of ecodesign in innovative companies in Brazil: survey and analysis of the main stimulus. Revista Produção Online, 17(2), 692–710. https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v17i2.2676

Issue

Section

Papers