Project portfolio management in the public sector: a literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v17i1.2428Keywords:
Portfolio Management. Project’s Portfolio. Public Sector. Government. Literature Review.Abstract
This study aims to investigate the project portfolio management in the public sector’s context. The methodological approach is a systematic literature review using the content analysis’ method. The sample consists of selected articles in ISI Web of Science and Scopus databases. The results lead to a theoretical framework summarizing the literature which contains eight thematic fields: portfolio and portfolio management, public sector and new public management, selection and prioritization, control, risks, strategic alignment, portfolio management’s problems and portfolio’s performance and success.Downloads
References
ANDERSON, T. E. Making GIG Information Assurance Better Through Portfolio Management. CrossTalk, v. 21, n. 7, p. 9–11, 2008.
ARLBJØRN, J. S.; FREYTAG, P. V.; THOMS, L. Portfolio management of development projects in Danish municipalities. International Journal of Public Sector Management, v. 28, n. 1, p. 11–28, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-03-2014-0047
BAKER, E.; SOLAK, S. Management of energy technology for sustainability: How to fund energy technology research and development. Production and Operations Management, v. 23, n. 3, p. 348–365, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/poms.12068
BENJAMIN, C. O. A Linear Goal-Programming Model for Public-Sector Project Selection. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, v. 36, n. 1, p. 13–23, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jors.1985.3
BOZEMAN, B.; ROGERS, J. Strategic management of government-sponsored R and D portfolios. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, v. 19, n. 3, p. 413–442, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/c1v
CÁÑEZ, L.; GARFIAS, M. Portfolio Management at the Mexican Petroleum Institute. Research Technology Management, v. 49, n. 4, p. 46–55, 2006.
CHAI, K.-H.; XIAO, X. Understanding design research: A bibliometric analysis of Design Studies (1996–2010). Design Studies, v. 33, n. 1, p. 24–43, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.004
CHEN, C.; IBEKWE-SANJUAN, F.; HOU, J. The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 61, n. 7, p. 1386–1409, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309
CRUZ-REYES, L. et al. A Decision Support System Framework for Public Project Portfolio Selection with Argumentation Theory. Studies in Computational Intelligence, v. 547, p. 467–479, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05170-3_32
CRUZ-REYES, L. et al. Simplification of Decision Rules for Recommendation of Projects in a Public Project Portfolio. Studies in Computational Intelligence, v. 601, p. 419–429, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17747-2_31
DETTBARN, J. L.; IBBS, C. W.; MURPHREE, E. L. Capital Project Portfolio Management for Federal Real Property. Journal of Management in Engineering, v. 21, n. 1, p. 44–53, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2005)21:1(44)
DUARTE, B. P. M.; REIS, A. Developing a projects evaluation system based on multiple attribute value theory. Computers & Operations Research, v. 33, n. 5, p. 1488–1504, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2004.11.003
EILAT, H.; GOLANY, B.; Shtub, A. Constructing and evaluating balanced portfolios of R&D projects with interactions: A DEA based methodology. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 172, n. 3, p. 1018-1039, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.001
FALAGAS, M. E. et al. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB journal, v. 22, n. 2, p. 338–342, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
FERNANDEZ, E. et al. Intelligent Techniques for R&D Project Selection in Large Social Organizations. Computación y Sistemas, v. 10, n. 1, p. 28–56, 2006.
FRYER, K. J.; ANTONY, J.; DOUGLAS, A. Critical success factors of continuous improvement in the public sector: A literature review and some key findings. The TQM Magazine, v. 19, n. 5, p. 497–517, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09544780710817900
GABRIEL, S. A.; ORDÓÑEZ, J. F.; FARIA, J. A. Contingency Planning in Project Selection Using Multiobjective Optimization and Chance Constraints. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, v. 12, n. 2, p. 112–120, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:2(112)
GONZÁLEZ, E. F. Analysis of the decision to assess and form R and D project portfolios: A critical and suggesting approach. Gestion y Politica Publica, v. 12, n. 1, p. 43–79, 2003.
GONZÁLEZ, E. F.; CASTILLO, J. N. Model and decision support system for portfolio problems in projects of social importance. Gestion y Politica Publica, v. 10, n. 1, p. 31–52, 2001.
GRIFFITH, A. Delivering best value in the small works portfolio of public sector organizations when using preferred contractors. Construction Management and Economics, v. 29, n. 9, p. 891–900, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.617377
HANSEN, L. K.; KRÆMMERGAARD, P. Transforming local government by project portfolio management: Identifying and Overcoming Control Problems. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, v. 7, n. 1, p. 50–75, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17506161311308160
HEINDRICKSON, G.; SANTOS JR, C. D. Information Technology Governance in Public Organizations: How Perceived Effectiveness Relates To Three Classical Mechanisms. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, v. 11, n. 2, p. 297–326, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752014000200005
KULK, G. P.; VERHOEF, C. Quantifying requirements volatility effects. Science of Computer Programming, v. 72, n. 3, p. 136–175, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2008.04.003
LEE, S. et al. Applying technology road-maps in project selection and planning. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, v. 25, n. 1, p. 39–51, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02656710810843568
LITVINCHEV, I.; LÓPEZ, F. An interactive algorithm for portfolio bi-criteria optimization of R&D projects in public organizations. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, v. 47, n. 1, p. 25–32, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11488-008-1004-0
MACCARI, E. A.; MARTINS, S. B.; MARTINS, C. B. Multi-Criteria Project Priorization in a Professional Master´s Program. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, v. 12, n. 2, p. 393–414, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752015000200011
MILLER, J. B.; EVJE, R. H. The practical application of delivery methods to project portfolios. Construction Management and Economics, v. 17, n. 5, p. 669–677, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014461999371277
MORAES, R. O.; LAURINDO, F. J. B. Relações entre o desempenho dos projetos de TI e a maturidade em gestão de projetos. Produção Online, v. 13, n. 1, p. 61-83, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v13i1.1027
MULDER, J.; BRENT, A. C. Selection of Sustainable Rural Agriculture Projects in South Africa: Case Studies in the LandCare Programme. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, v. 28, n. 2, p. 55–84, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J064v28n02_06
MUNSON, J. M.; SPIVEY, W. A. Take a portfolio view of Cradas. Research Technology Management, v. 49, n. 4, p. 39–45, 2006.
NIELSEN, J. A.; PEDERSEN, K. IT portfolio decision-making in local governments: Rationality, politics, intuition and coincidences. Government Information Quarterly, v. 31, n. 3, p. 411–420, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.04.002
ODECK, J. What Determines Decision Makers’ Preferences for Road Investments? Evidence from the Norwegian Road Sector. Transport Reviews, v. 30, n. 4, p. 473–494, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01441640903138640
OFIARA, D. D.; PSUTY, N. P. Suitability of Decision-Theoretic Models to Public Policy Issues Concerning the Provision of Shoreline Stabilization and Hazard Management. Coastal Management, v. 29, n. 4, p. 271–294, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089207501750475109
PEREIRA, P. L.; VELOSO, F. M. R&D activity selection process: Building a strategy-aligned R&D portfolio for government and nonprofit organizations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, v. 56, n. 1, p. 95–105, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2008.2009872
PILKAITĖ, A.; CHMIELIAUSKAS, A. Changes in Public Sector Management: Establishment of Project Management Offices – A Comparative Case Study of Lithuania and Denmark. Public Policy and Administration, v. 14, n. 2, p. 291–306, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.13165/VPA-15-14-2-10
RADNOR, Z. J.; NOKE, H. Conceptualising and contextualising public sector operations management. Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations, v. 24, n. 10–11, p. 867–876, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2012.666884
RANDOLPH, J. J. A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, v. 14, n. 13, 2009.
ROSA, F. L.; JUNG, C. F.; MENGDEN, P. R. Um modelo para avaliação do potencial estratégico de projeto de P&D de inovação tecnológica. Produção Online, v. 13, n. 3, p. 1167-1196, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v13i3.1421
RWELAMILA, P. D.; PURUSHOTTAM, N. Project Management Trilogy Challenges in Africa-Where to From Here? Project Management Journal, v. 43, n. 4, p. 5–13, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21278
SCHEINBERG, M.; STRETTON, A. Multiproject planning: tuning portfolio indices. International Journal of Project Management, v. 12, n. 2, p. 107–114, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(94)90017-5
SMITH, P. et al. Budget-constrained portfolio trades using multiobjective optimization. Systems Engineering, v. 15, n. 4, p. 461–470, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sys.21212
TSAI, C.-C.; WEN, M. L. Research and trends in science education from 1998 to 2002: a content analysis of publication in selected journals. International Journal of Science Education, v. 27, n. 1, p. 3–14, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000243727
YOUNG, R. et al. Is strategy being implemented through projects? Contrary evidence from a leader in New Public Management. International Journal of Project Management, v. 30, n. 8, p. 887–900, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.03.003
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Journal reserves the right to make spelling and grammatical changes, aiming to keep a default language, respecting, however, the style of the authors.
The published work is responsibility of the (s) author (s), while the Revista Produção Online is only responsible for the evaluation of the paper. The Revista Produção Online is not responsible for any violations of Law No. 9.610 / 1998, the Copyright Act.
The journal allows the authors to keep the copyright of accepted articles, without restrictions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License .
