Revisão sistemática do método TOPSIS e suas aplicações na agricultura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v24i2.5245Palavras-chave:
Agricultura, Tomada de Decisão, Método TOPSIS, PRISMAResumo
A agricultura desempenha um papel significativo na economia global e também no desenvolvimento econômico e social. Para aumentar a produtividade, a sustentabilidade e a competitividade em todo o mundo, bem como no Brasil, onde a agricultura representa uma parte significativa do PIB, é necessário tomar decisões eficazes no setor agrícola. Ainda que a tomada de decisões seja importante na agricultura, ainda há lacunas a serem preenchidas. É difícil para os gestores e tomadores de decisão agrícolas encontrar uma base sólida para avaliar opções em situações difíceis. Para o desenvolvimento do artigo, as publicações sobre a aplicação do método Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) na agricultura e no meio ambiente foram analisadas de acordo com as diretrizes do método Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Como resultado, este artigo fornece informações importantes para a difusão e ajuda a apoiar os avanços no uso do método TOPSIS e suas variantes na agricultura moderna.
Downloads
Referências
ABDULLAH, K. H. et al. Unearthing hidden research opportunities through bibliometric analysis: a review. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, v. 5, n. 1, p. 251-262, 2023.
ANGELO, A. C. M. Multicriteria decision-making methods for results interpretation of life cycle assessment. In: Methods in Sustainability Science. Elsevier, 2021. p. 153-168.
BAHAR, H.; YAQIN, M. A. Implementation of TOPSIS (technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution) in determining poverty ranking of village communities as recommendations for government assistance. Applied Technology and Computing Science Journal, v. 3, n. 2, p. 64-73, 2020.
BELESKI, I. M.; JUNIOR, F. R. L. Um estudo comparativo entre métodos Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS no contexto de seleção de fornecedores. Exacta, 2023.
CAO, X.; WEI, C.; XIE, D. Evaluation of scale management suitability based on the entropy-TOPSIS method. Land, v. 10, n. 4, p. 416, 2021.
CHANG, T. et al. Reporting Quality of Oral TCM Systematic Reviews Based on the PRISMA Harms Checklist from 2013 to 2020. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, v. 2023, 2023.
CHANG, Y.; LIANG, Y. Intelligent Risk Assessment of Ecological Agriculture Projects from a Vision of Low Carbon. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 7, p. 5765, 2023.
CHENG, L.; GAO, Y.; DAI, X. Spatio-temporal comprehensive measurement of China’s agricultural green development level and associated influencing factors. PLoS One, v. 18, n. 8, p. e0288599, 2023.
COMPANHIA NACIONAL DE ABASTECIMENTO. CONAB. Safra Brasileira. Disponível em: < https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/graos> . Acesso em 08 de abril de 2024.
DAS, S. et al. A systematic assessment of multi‐dimensional risk factors for sustainable development in food grain supply chains: a business strategic prospective analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 32, n. 8, p. 5536-5562, 2023.
DEAN, M. Including multiple perspectives in participatory multi-criteria analysis: A framework for investigation. Evaluation, v. 28, n. 4, p. 505-539, 2022.
DE SOUZA, L. P.; GOMES, C. F. S.; DE BARROS, A. P. Implementation of new hybrid AHP–TOPSIS-2N method in sorting and prioritizing of an it CAPEX project portfolio. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, v. 17, n. 04, p. 977-1005, 2018.
DO NASCIMENTO, R. F.; CANTERI, M. H. G.; KOVALESKI, J. L. Impacto dos sistemas de recompensas na motivação organizacional: revisão sistemática pelo método PRISMA. Revista Gestão & Conexões, v. 8, n. 2, p. 44-58, 2019.
ELLILI, N. O. D. Bibliometric analysis of sustainability papers: Evidence from Environment, Development and sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, p. 1-27, 2023.
ERGASHEVICH, A. A. Improving the Process of Providing the Agricultural Sector with Resources. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET). 10, p. 1416 – 1418, 2022. ISSN: 2321-9653.
FIROUZI, S. et al. Hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to select appropriate biomass resources for biofuel production. Science of the Total Environment, v. 770, p. 144449, 2021.
FUENTES, A. Reseña de sitio web: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Declaración PRISMA 2020. Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación, v. 9, n. 2, p. 323-327, 2022.
GANCONE, A. et al. Towards climate neutrality via sustainable agriculture in soil management. Environmental and Climate Technologies, v. 26, n. 1, p. 535-547, 2022.
GONG, H. et al. Spatiotemporal patterns in and key influences on cultivated-land multi-functionality in Northeast China’s black-soil region. Land, v. 11, n. 7, p. 1101, 2022.
HAI, N. T. et al. Application of a similarity measure using fuzzy sets to select the optimal plan for an air-assisted rice seeder. Applied Sciences, v. 11, n. 15, p. 6715, 2021.
HAIJING, R.; YAFEI, L.; SHENGXI, D. Research on the Measurement of Agricultural Green Development Level in Qinghai Province. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, 2019. p. 052031.
HAN, W. et al. Optimizing drip fertigation management based on yield, quality, water and fertilizer use efficiency of wine grape in North China. Agricultural Water Management, v. 280, p. 108188, 2023.
HAYATU, N. G. et al. Carbon sequestration rate, nitrogen use efficiency and rice yield responses to long-term substitution of chemical fertilizer by organic manure in a rice–rice cropping system. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, v. 22, n. 9, p. 2848-2864, 2023.
HWANG, C. et al. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey, p. 58-191, 1981.
ISLAM, S.; MANNING, L.; CULLEN, J. M. A hybrid traceability technology selection approach for sustainable food supply chains. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 16, p. 9385, 2021.
INNOCENTI, T. et al. Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, v. 26, n. 5, p. 100450, 2022.
JIANG, Z. et al. Combined application of coffee husk compost and inorganic fertilizer to improve the soil ecological environment and photosynthetic characteristics of arabica coffee. Agronomy, v. 13, n. 5, p. 1212, 2023.
JIN, S.; MEI, Z.; DUAN, K. Coupling Coordination of China’s Agricultural Environment and Economy under the New Economic Background. Agriculture, v. 12, n. 8, p. 1147, 2022.
JUANPERA, M. et al. Methodology for Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making with Uncertainty (MIMDU) for Robust Analysis. Case Study About Agricultural Efficiency in Colombia. In: The International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management. Cham: Springer International Publishing, p. 119-123, 2022.
KAMA, R. et al. Combination of intercropping maize and soybean with root exudate additions reduces metal mobility in soil-plant system under wastewater irrigation. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, v. 266, p. 115549, 2023.
KURDYŚ-KUJAWSKA, A. et al. Crop insurance, land productivity and the environment: A way forward to a better understanding. Agriculture, v. 11, n. 11, p. 1108, 2021.
LEDARI, M. B.; SABOOHI, Y.; AZAMIAN, S. The tolerance level of the ecosystem as a limited constrain in the development planning. Ecological Indicators, v. 132, p. 108265, 2021.
LI, D. et al. Trade-off and Synergy of Rural Functions Under County Depopulation in the Typical Black Soil Region of Northeast China. Chinese Geographical Science, v. 33, n. 4, p. 616-633, 2023.
LI, J. et al. Tomato performance and changes in soil chemistry in response to salinity and Na/Ca ratio of irrigation water. Agricultural Water Management, v. 285, p. 108363, 2023.
LI, J. Land suitability analysis of urban agriculture for different investment scenarios: Evidence from fuzhou of China. Heliyon, v. 9, n. 10, 2023.
LI, M.; WANG, J.; CHEN, Y. Evaluation and influencing factors of sustainable development capability of agriculture in countries along the belt and road route. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 7, p. 2004, 2019.
LI, T. et al. Multiple cutting increases forage productivity and enhances legume pasture stability in a rainfed agroecosystem. Annals of Agricultural Sciences, v. 68, n. 2, p. 126-136, 2023.
LI, W. et al. Combination of artificial zeolite and microbial fertilizer to improve mining soils in an arid area of Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Arid Land, v. 15, n. 9, p. 1067-1083, 2023.
LI, Y. et al. Assessment of Land Ecological Security Based on the Boston Model: A Case Study from China. Land, v. 12, n. 7, p. 1348, 2023.
LI, Y. et al. Evaluation of Irrigation-Drainage Scheme under Water Level Regulation Based on TOPSIS in Southern China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, v. 30, n. 1, 2021.
LIU, Q. et al. A Full-Scale Optimization of a Crop Spatial Planting Structure and its Associated Effects. Engineering, v. 28, p. 139-152, 2023.
LU, Y.; CHEN, Y. Is China's agricultural enterprise growing steadily? Evidence from listed agricultural companies. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, v. 19, n. 2, p. 203-212, 2021.
LUO, B. et al. Managing agricultural water considering water allocation priority based on remote sensing data. Remote Sensing, v. 13, n. 8, p. 1536, 2021.
MA, C. et al. Effects of Phosphate Application Rate on Grain Yield and Nutrition Use of Summer Maize under the Coastal Saline-Alkali Land. Agronomy, v. 13, n. 11, p. 2668, 2023.
MA, Y. et al. Agricultural vulnerability assessment of high-temperature disaster in Shaanxi Province of China. Agriculture, v. 12, n. 7, p. 980, 2022.
MA, Y. et al. Assessment of maize drought risk in Midwestern Jilin Province: A comparative analysis of TOPSIS and VIKOR models. Remote Sensing, v. 14, n. 10, p. 2399, 2022.
MA, Z. et al. Effect of water and nitrogen coupling regulation on the growth, physiology, yield, and quality attributes and comprehensive evaluation of wolfberry (Lycium barbarum L.). Frontiers in Plant Science, v. 14, p. 1130109, 2023.
MAITRA, S. et al. Multi-criteria Decision Making and Its Application to Online Learning Platform Selection During the COVID-19 Pandemic Based on TOPSIS Method. In: Real Life Applications of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Techniques in Fuzzy Domain. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, p. 507-519, 2022.
MEHMOOD, F. et al. Optimizing irrigation management sustained grain yield, crop water productivity, and mitigated greenhouse gas emissions from the winter wheat field in North China Plain. Agricultural Water Management, v. 290, p. 108599, 2023.
MU, T. et al. Coupling effect of water and soluble organic fertilizer on yield and quality of Panax notoginseng under micro-sprinkler irrigation in Southwest China. Agronomy, v. 13, n. 7, p. 1742, 2023.
PENG, H. et al. Water requirements and comprehensive benefit evaluation of diversified crop rotations in the Huang-Huai Plain. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 13, p. 10229, 2023.
PEREIRA, A. C. et al. Uso da análise multicritério baseada no método híbrido AHP/TOPSIS para implantação de intervenções de programas hidroambientais: estudo de caso na bacia hidrográfica do rio Doce. Revista Mineira de Recursos Hídricos, v. 3, 2022.
PONTES, A. C. da S. J. E.; MUSETTI, M. A. Avaliação de desempenho de fornecedores em Healthcare: uma proposta de estrutura integrada utilizando fu Fuzzy TOPSIS Class e Matriz Kraljic. Revista Produção Online, [S. l.], v. 22, n. 3, p. 3183–3207, 2023. DOI: 10.14488/1676-1901.v22i3.4303. Disponível em: https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4303. Acesso em: 8 abr. 2024.
PONTES, A. C. da S. J. E.; MUSETTI, M. A. Avaliação de desempenho de fornecedores em Healthcare: uma proposta de estrutura integrada utilizando fu Fuzzy TOPSIS Class e Matriz Kraljic. Revista Produção Online, [S. l.], v. 22, n. 3, p. 3183–3207, 2023. DOI: 10.14488/1676-1901.v22i3.4303. Disponível em: https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4303. Acesso em: 9 abr. 2024.
RAFAEL, B. M. The importance of agricultural development projects: a focus on sustenance and employment creation in Kenya, Malawi, Namibia, Rwanda, and Uganda. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment, v. 12, n. 2, p. 152-170, 2023.
ROUYENDEGH, B. D.; SAVALAN, Ş. An integrated fuzzy MCDM hybrid methodology to analyze agricultural production. Sustainability, v. 14, n. 8, p. 4835, 2022.
SANTOS, F. J. dos; COELHO, A. LV. A multi-view approach to multi-criteria decision making. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1-26, 2023.
SHAYANMEHR, S. et al. The impacts of climate change on water resources and crop production in an arid region. Agriculture, v. 12, n. 7, p. 1056, 2022.
SHEIKH, V. et al. Land use optimization through bridging multiobjective optimization and multicriteria decision‐making models (case study: Tilabad Watershed, Golestan Province, Iran). Natural Resource Modeling, v. 34, n. 2, p. e12301, 2021.
SMOLUK-SIKORSKA, J.; MALINOWSKI, M. An attempt to apply canonical analysis to investigate the dependencies between the level of organic farming development in Poland and the chosen environmental determinants. Energies, v. 14, n. 24, p. 8390, 2021.
SRIDEVY, S.; DEVI, M. N.; SANKAR, M. Decision support systems in agricultural industry perspectiveInt J Stat Appl Math. 8(2S) p.29-31, 2023. DOI: 10.22271/maths.2023.v8.i2Sa.984
SUN, J. et al. Development and application of a new water-carbon-economy coupling model (WCECM) for optimal allocation of agricultural water and land resources. Agricultural Water Management, v. 291, p. 108608, 2023.
SUN, L. et al. Optimising water and nitrogen management for greenhouse tomatoes in Northeast China using EWM− TOPSIS− AISM model. Agricultural Water Management, v. 290, p. 108579, 2023.
SUN, L.et al. Moderate water deficit and nitrogen application rate are conducive to improving the nitrogen uptake and yield of greenhouse tomatoes. Rhizosphere, v. 28, p. 100789, 2023.
VALENÇA, A. K. A. Metodologias ativas no ensino de engenharia: uma revisão bibliométrica. Revista Produção Online, [S. l.], v. 23, n. 2, p. 4982, 2023. DOI: 10.14488/1676-1901.v23i2.4982. Disponível em: https://www.producaoonline.org.br/rpo/article/view/4982. Acesso em: 2 abr. 2024.
VIEIRA, E. P.; SAUSEN, J. O.; ROHENKOHL, L. B. A precificação no mercado de máquinas agrícolas: o valor percebido pelo cliente. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, [S. l.], v. 14, n. 2, p. 2499–2521, 2023. DOI: 10.7769/gesec.v14i2.1727. Disponível em: https://ojs.revistagesec.org.br/secretariado/article/view/1727. Acesso em: 7 abr. 2024.
VISTARTE, L. et al. An Assessment of the Impact of Latvian New Common Agriculture Policy: Transition to Climate Neutrality. Environmental and Climate Technologies, v. 27, n. 1, p. 683-695, 2023.
WANG, H.; TANG, Y. Spatiotemporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Coupling Coordination between Digital Village and Green and High-Quality Agricultural Development—Evidence from China. Sustainability, v. 15, n. 10, p. 8079, 2023.
WANG, L. et al. Assessing the impact of biochar and nitrogen application on yield, water-nitrogen use efficiency and quality of intercropped maize and soybean. Frontiers in Plant Science, v. 14, p. 1171547, 2023.
WANG, S. et al. Diversified crop rotations reduce groundwater use and enhance system resilience. Agricultural Water Management, v. 276, p. 108067, 2023.
WANG, Z. et al. Evaluation of agricultural extension service for sustainable agricultural development using a hybrid entropy and TOPSIS method. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 1, p. 347, 2021.
WANG, Z. et al. Evaluation of sustainable and analysis of influencing factors for agriculture sector: Evidence from Jiangsu Province, China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, v. 10, p. 836002, 2022.
WANG, Z. et al. Integrated evaluation of the water deficit irrigation scheme of indigowoad root under mulched drip irrigation in arid regions of Northwest China based on the improved TOPSIS method. Water, v. 13, n. 11, p. 1532, 2021.
XIE, S.; ZHANG, J. TOPSIS-based comprehensive measure of variable importance in predictive modelling. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 232, p. 120682, 2023.
YANG, Z. et al. Heavy metal pollution and soil quality assessment under different land uses in the red soil region, Southern China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, v. 19, n. 7, p. 4125, 2022.
YANG, Z. et al. Resource and environment constraints and promotion strategies of rural vitality: An empirical analysis of rural revitalization model towns. Frontiers in Environmental Science, v. 10, p. 956644, 2022.
ZHANG, Q. et al. Study on health evaluation of an ecological irrigation district in Helan County, China. Water, v. 13, n. 23, p. 3325, 2021.
ZHANG, R.; CHEN, M. Spatial Differentiation and Driving Mechanism of Agricultural Multifunctions in Economically Developed Areas: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province, China. Land, v. 11, n. 10, p. 1728, 2022.
ZHENG, S. et al. Deficit drip irrigation improves kiwifruit quality and water productivity under rain-shelter cultivation in the humid area of South China. Agricultural Water Management, v. 289, p. 108530, 2023.
ZHOU, C. et al. Optimizing water and nitrogen management strategies to improve their use efficiency, eggplant yield and fruit quality. Frontiers in Plant Science, v. 14, p. 1211122, 2023.
ZHOU, F.; WEN, C. Research on the level of agricultural green development, regional disparities, and dynamic distribution evolution in China from the perspective of sustainable development. Agriculture, v. 13, n. 7, p. 1441, 2023.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Produção Online
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A Revista se reserva no direito de efetuar, no artigo publicado, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores.
A obra publicada é de inteira responsabilidade do(s) autor(es), cabendo à Revista Produção Online apenas a avaliação da obra, na qualidade de veículo de publicação científica. A Revista Produção Online não se responsabiliza por eventuais violações à Lei nº 9.610/1998, Lei de Direito Autoral.
A revista Produção Online permite que o autor detenha o copyright dos artigos aceitos para publicação, sem restrições.
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons.
