Influência das práticas comportamentais e técnicas no desempenho e riscos de sustentabilidade
uma análise em empresas brasileiras com modelagem de equações estruturais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v24i3.5050Palavras-chave:
Práticas de sustentabilidade, Desempenho em sustentabilidade, Riscos de sustentabilidade, Modelagem de equações estruturaisResumo
A crescente importância da sustentabilidade nas cadeias de suprimento é elemento central dessa pesquisa, aliada ao aumento da complexidade das cadeias por aspectos geográficos, políticos e comportamentais. O objetivo dessa pesquisa foi examinar o papel das práticas comportamentais e técnicas e a importância delas para o desempenho organizacional e nos riscos de sustentabilidade. Nessa pesquisa, com 152 empresas, foi realizada uma modelagem de equações estruturais (SEM) identificando o teste das hipóteses do modelo estrutural. As principais descobertas da pesquisa são consistentes com o modelo de hipótese e destacam uma influência positiva das práticas comportamentais nas práticas técnicas e no desempenho em sustentabilidade nas empresas. Este estudo contribui para os gestores, oferecendo uma visão da gestão dos riscos de sustentabilidade na cadeia de suprimentos. O estudo contribui ainda para a literatura, apresentando o conhecimento sobre a relação entre os riscos, desempenho e as práticas de sustentabilidade.
Downloads
Referências
ADEBAYO, T. et al. The role of economic complexity in the environmental Kuznets curve of MINT economies: evidence from method of moments quantile regress. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2021.
ANDERSON, J. C.; GERBING, D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step. Psychological Bulletin, v. 103, n. 3, p. 411–423, 1988.
ANUAR, A.; MARWAN, N.; SMITH, J.; SIRIYANUN, S.; SHARIF, A. Bibliometric analysis of immigration and environmental degradation: Evidence from past decades. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 29, p. 13.729-13.741, 2022.
AGUINIS, H. et al. Conducting Management Research in Latin America: Why and What’s in It for You? Journal of Management, v. 46, n. 5, p. 615–636, 2020.
ASHBY, A.; LEAT, M.; HUDSON-SMITH, M. Making connections: A review of supply chain manag. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, v. 17, n. 5, p. 497-516, 2012.
AWAYSHEH, A.; KLASSEN, R. D. The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, v. 30, n. 12, p. 1246-1268, 2010.
BALIGA, R.; RAUT, R. D.; KAMBLE, S. S. Sustainable supply chain management practices and performance. Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal, v. 31, p. 1147-1182, 2019.
BARCLAY, D.; HIGGINS, C.; THOMPSON, R. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modelling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration, Special Issue on Research Methodology, v. 2, n. 2, p. 285-309, 1995.
BARDIN, L. El analisis de contenido. Ediciones Akal, 1996.
BREGMAN, R.; PENG, D.; CHIN, W. The effect of controversial global sourcing practices on the ethical judgments and intentions of U.S. Consumers. J. Operations Management, v. 36, p. 229-243, 2015.
BRYMAN, A. Social Research Methods. 5th ed. London: Oxford University Press, 2016.
BUSSE, C. Doing Well by Doing Good? The Self-interest of Buying Firms and Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Journal of Supply Chain Management., v. 52, n. 2, p. 28-47, 2016.
BUSSE, C. et al. Extending the supply chain visibility boundary: Utilizing stakeholders for identifying supply chain sustainability risks. Int Journal of Physical Distrib & Logistics Management, v. 47, n. 1, p. 18-40, 2017.
BUSSE, C.; KACK, E.; BODE, C. Sustainability and the False Sense of Legitimacy. Journal of Business Logistics, p. 312-328, 2016.
CHANDIO, A.; JIANG, Y.; AKRAM, W.; ADEEL, S.; IRFAN, M.; JAN, I. Addressing the effect of climate change in the framework of financial and technological development on cereal production in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 288, p. 125637, 2021.
CHEARSKULL, P. An empirical investigation of Performance Measurement System use and organizational performance. 2010. Doctoral Dissertation.
CHO, Y. S.; JUNG, J. Y.; LINDERMAN, K. The QM evolution: behavioral quality management as a firm's strategic resource. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 191, p. 233–249, 2017.
CHRISTOPHER, M. Logistics and Supply Chain Management. 3rd ed. London: Pitman, 2005.
DAI, J.; XIE, L.; CHU, Z. Developing sustainable supply chain management: The interplay of institutional pressures and sustainability capabilities. Sustainable Production and Consumption, v. 28, p. 254-268, 2021.
DUBEY, R.; GUNASEKARAN, A.; ALI, S. S. Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 160, p. 120–132, 2015.
DUBEY, R. et al. Examining the effect of external pressures and organizational culture on shaping performance measurement systems for sustainability benchmarking. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 193, p. 63-76, 2017.
FENG, M. et al. Green supply chain management and financial performance: the mediating roles of operational and environmental. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 27, n. 7, p. 811–824, 2018.
FLYNN, B.; HUANG, X.; ZHAO, X. Supply chain management in emerging markets: critical research issues. Journal of Supply Chain Management, v. 51, n. 1, p. 3–4, 2015.
FLYNN, B.; PAGELL, M.; FUGATE, B. Survey research design in supply chain management: the need for evolution. Journal of Supply Chain Management, v. 54, n. 1, p. 1–15, 2018.
FORZA, C. Survey research in operation management: a process-based perspective. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., v. 22, n. 2, p. 152-194, 2002.
FORZA, C. Surveys. In: KARLSSON, C. (Ed.). Research methods for operations management. 2. ed. Routledge, 2016. p. 86.
GARETTI, M.; TAISCH, M. Sustainable manufacturing: trends and research challenges. Production Planning and Control, v. 23, p. 83-104, 2012.
GENG, R. Q.; MANSOURI, A.; AKTAS, E. The relationship between green supply chain management and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 183, p. 245–258, 2017.
GOVINDAN, K.; KHODAVERDI, R.; VAFADARNIKJOO, A. Intuitionistic fuzzy based DEMATEL method for developing green practices and performances in a green supply chain. Expert Systems with Applications, v. 42, n. 20, p. 7207–7220, 2015.
GREEN, K.; ZELBST, P.; MEACHAM, J.; BHADAURIA, V. Green supply chain management practices. Supply Chain Management, v. 17, n. 3, p. 290–305, 2012.
GIANNAKIS, M.; PAPADOPOULOS, T. Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 171, p. 455-470, 2016.
HAIR, J. F.; BLACK, W. C.; BABIN, B. J.; ANDERSON, R. E. Multivariate data analysis. 7. ed. Pearson, 2019.
HAIR, J. F. Jr. et al. Multivariate data analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Educ, 2006.
HOFMANN, H. et al. Sustainability-Related Supply Chain Risks: Conceptualization and Management. Business Strategy and the Environment, v. 23, n. 3, p. 160-172, 2014.
ISO 20400:2017. Provides guidance to organizations, independent of their activity or size, on integrating sustainability within procurement, as described in ISO 26000.
JABBOUR, C. et al. Green product development and performance of Brazilian firms: measuring the role of human and technical aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 87, p. 442–451, 2015.
JABBOUR, Charbel; MAURICIO, André; JABBOUR, Ana. Critical success factors and green supply chain management proactivity: shedding light on the human aspects of this relationship based on cases from the Brazilian. Production Planning & Control, v. 28, n. 6–8, p. 671–683, 2017.
KAUPPI, K.; LUZZINI, D. Measuring institutional pressures in a supply chain context: Scale development and testing. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, v. 27, n. 7, p. 79-107, 2022.
KASSOLIS, M. The diffusion of environmental management in Greece through rationalist approaches: driver or product of globalisation? Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 15, n. 18, p. 1886–1893, 2007.
KUMAR, A. et al. Evaluating the human resource related soft dimensions in green supply chain management implementation. Prod Plan Control, v. 30, p. 699–715, 2019.
LAARI, S. et al. Firm performance and customer-driven green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 112, p. 1960–1970, 2016.
LIU, J. et al. Behavioral and technical perspectives of green supply chain management practices. Transportation Research Part E, v. 140, 2020.
LUTHRA, S.; GARG, D.; HALEEM, A. Critical success factors of green supply chain management for achieving sustainability in Indian autom. Production Planning and Control, v. 26, n. 5, p. 339–362, 2015.
LUTHRA, S.; GARG, D.; HALEEM, A. The impacts of critical success factors for implementing green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 121, p. 142–158, 2016.
MANI, V.; DELGADO, C. Supply Chain Social Sustainability for Manufacturing. Measurement and Performance Outcomes. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, 2019.
MARCULETIU, A.; ATASEVEN, C.; MACKELPRANG, A. A review of how pressures and their sources drive sustainable supply chain management practices. Journal of Business Logistics, v. 44, n. 2, p. 257-288, 2023.
MARSHALL, D. et al. Environmental and social supply chain management sustainability practices. Production Planning and Control, v. 26, n. 8, p. 673-690, 2015.
MITRA, S.; DATTA, P. P. Adoption of green supply chain management practices and their impact on performance: An exploratory study of Indian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, v. 52, n. 7, p. 2085-2107, 2014.
MURPHY, J.; GOULDSON, A. Environmental policy and industrial innovation: integrating environment and economy through ecological modernisation. Geoforum, v. 31, n. 1, p. 33–44, 2000.
NAGARAJAN, M.; SOŠIĆ, G. Game-Theoretic Analysis of Cooperation Among Supply Chain Agents: Review and Extensions. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 187, n. 3, p. 719-745, 2008.
NGUYEN, H. Manufacturing Processes and Engineering Materials Used in Automotive Engine Block. Materials Science and Engineering Section B, EGR250, p. 11-23, 2005.
NUREEN, N. et al. Exploring the technical and behavioral dimensions of green supply chain management: a roadmap toward environmental sustainability. Envir Science & Pollution Res, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20352-5. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2024.
PASQUAL, L. Validade dos testes psicológicos: será possível reencontrar o caminho? Psicologia. Teoria e Pesquisa, v. 231, p. 99-107, 2007.
PENG, D.; LAI, F. Using partial least squares in operations management research: A practical guideline and summary. Journal of Operations Management, v. 30, n. 6, p. 467-480, 2012.
RAJEEV, A. et al. Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 162, p. 299-314, 2017.
RAZZAQ, A.; SHARIF, A.; AZIZ, N.; IRFAN, M.; JERMSITTIPARSET, K. Asymmetric link between environmental pollution and COVID-19 in the top ten affected states of the US: A novel estimation from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environmental Research, v. 191, p. 110189, 2020.
ROMANO, A. L. et al. A study on organizational culture in the brazilian cosmetics sector. Revista de Administração da UFSM, v. 11, n. 5, p. 1305-1323, 2018.
ROMANO, A. L. et al. Avaliação da sustentabilidade corporativa e da cultura organizacional–survey no setor brasileiro de cosméticos. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, v. 9, n. 1, p. 142-158, 2015.
ROMANO, A. L.; FERREIRA, L. M.; CAEIRO, S. S. Modelling Sustainability Risk in the Brazilian Cosmetics Industry. Sustainability, v. 13, p. 13771, 2021.
ROMANO, A. L.; FERREIRA, L. M. D. F.; CAEIRO, S. S. F. S. Why companies adopt supply chain sustainability practices: A study of companies in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 433, p. 139725, 2023.
ROMANO, A. L.; FERREIRA, L. M. D. F. How to transform sustainability practices into organizational benefits? The role of different cultural characteristics. Operations Management Research, v. 16, p. 192–208, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00251-7. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2024.
ROMANO, A. L. Gestão de riscos sustentáveis e complexidade em cadeias de suprimentos globais: estratégias proativas e desafios. South American Development Society Journal, v. 9, p. 1, 2023.
ROMANO, A. L.; FERREIRA, L. M. D. F.; CAEIRO, S. S. F. S. Um estudo sobre teorias organizacionais e fatores para avaliar riscos de sustentabilidade em cadeias de suprimentos. Sustainable Business International Journal, v. 1, n. 96, 2024.
ROY, S.; SIVAKUMAR, K.; WILKINSON, I. Innovation Generation in Supply Chain Relationships: A Conceptual Model. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, v. 32, n. 61, p. 61-79, 2004.
SARKIS, J.; ZHU, Q.; LAI, K. H. An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International Journal of Prod Economics, v. 130, n. 1, p. 1-15, 2011.
SEURING, S.; MÜLLER, M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 16, n. 15, p. 1699-1710, 2008.
SEURING, S.; GOLD, S. Sustainability management beyond corporate boundaries: from stakeholders to performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 56, p. 1-6, 2013.
SHAO, L.; ZHANG, H.; IRFAN, M. How public expenditure in recreational and cultural industry and socioeconomic status caused environmental sustainability in OECD countries? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, v. 34, n. 1, p. 1-18, 2021.
WANG, Y.; YANG, Y. Analyzing the green innovation practices based on sustainability performance indicators: A Chinese manufacturing industry case. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 28, p. 1.181-1.203, 2021.
XU, M. et al. Supply chain sustainability risk and assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 225, p. 857-867, 2019.
YAMOAH, F. A.; YAWSON, D. E. Assessing Supermarket Food Shopper Reaction to Horsemeat Scandal in the United Kingdon. International Review of Management and Marketing, p. 98-107, 2014.
YANG, Q.; DU, Q.; RAZZAQ, A.; SHANG, Y. How volatility in green financing, clean energy, and green economic practices derive sustainable performance through ESG indicators? A sectoral study of G7 countries. Resources Policy, v. 75, p. 102526, 2022.
YU, W. et al. Integrated green supply chain management and operational performance. Supply Chain Manag, v. 19, n. 5/6, p. 683-696, 2014.
ZHANG, H.; RAZZAQ, A.; PELIT, H.; IRMAK, E. Does freight and passenger transportation industries are sustainable in BRICS countries? Evidence from advance panel estimations. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, v. 35, n. 1, p. 3.690-3.710, 2021.
ZHU, Q.; GENG, Y. Drivers and barriers of extended supply chain practices for energy saving and emission reduction among Chinese manufacture. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 40, p. 6–12, 2013.
ZHU, Q.; SARKIS, J.; LAI, K. Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, v. 111, n. 2, p. 261–273, 2008.
ZIMMERMANN, F.; FOERSTL, K. A meta-analysis of the purchasing and supply management practice-performance link. Journal of Supply Chain Management, v. 50, n. 3, p. 37-53, 2014.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Produção Online
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
A Revista se reserva no direito de efetuar, no artigo publicado, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores.
A obra publicada é de inteira responsabilidade do(s) autor(es), cabendo à Revista Produção Online apenas a avaliação da obra, na qualidade de veículo de publicação científica. A Revista Produção Online não se responsabiliza por eventuais violações à Lei nº 9.610/1998, Lei de Direito Autoral.
A revista Produção Online permite que o autor detenha o copyright dos artigos aceitos para publicação, sem restrições.
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons.
