A relação entre métodos de ensino e estilos de aprendizagem lean manufacturing: uma pesquisa empírica sobre um curso de pós-graduação em engenharia de produção
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14488/1676-1901.v18i1.2682Palavras-chave:
Métodos tradicionais de ensino. Aprendizagem baseada em problemas. Índice de estilo de aprendizagem. Produção enxuta.Resumo
Devido a uma crescente concorrência mundial em relação ao desempenho operacional e lucros empresariais, a Lean Manufacturing (LM) tem sido uma matéria emergente e relevante entre os cursos de pós-graduação em Engenharia de Produção e Gestão de Negócios. Apesar dos avanços no ensino de princípios e técnicas de LM, o caráter prático inerente ao LM mina a aprendizagem e o desenvolvimento dos alunos. Nesse sentido, este estudo visa propor uma metodologia para aprimorar o aprendizado de LM de graduados em Engenharia de Produção de um curso de pós-graduação stricto sensu. A metodologia proposta combina os métodos tradicionais de ensino com a abordagem PBL (abordagem baseada em problemas), baseada em problemas reais de empresas em fase de implementação lean. O método é ilustrado com um exemplo em uma universidade pública brasileira, que foi um dos precursores no ensino de Engenharia de Produção no Brasil em nível de pós-graduação. Os resultados indicam que o PBL pode ser um método complementar eficaz para o aprendizado de LM, especialmente se os estudantes de pós-graduação são expostos a problemas reais em empresas que estão passando por uma implementação lean e relacionam isto com o corpo atual da literatura.
Downloads
Referências
ALVES, A.; DINIS-CARVALHO, J.; SOUSA, R. Lean production as promoter of thinkers to achieve companies’ agility. Learning Organization, v. 19, n. 3, p. 219-237, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696471211219930
ALVES, A.; KAHLEN, F.; FLUMERFELT, S.; MANALANG, A. The lean production multidisciplinary: from operations to education. 7th International Conference on Production Research, Americas, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/36785
ARIANI, D. Personality and learning motivation. European Journal of Business and Management, v. 5, p. 10-26, 2013.
BADURDEEN, F.; MARKSBERRY, P.; HALL, A.; GREGORY, B. Teaching lean manufacturing with simulations and games: a survey and future directions. Simulation & Gaming, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878109334331
BARRON, B.; SCHWARTZ, D.; VYE, N.; MOORE, A.; PETROSINO, A.; ZECH, L.; BRANSFORD, J. Doing with understanding: lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, v.7, n. 3-4, p. 271-311, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672056
BAYRAM, S.; DENIZ, L.; ERDOĞAN, Y. The role of personality traits in web-based education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology–TOJET, v.7, n. 2, p. 5-41, 2008.
BÉDARD, D.; LISON, C.; DALLE, D.; CÔTÉ, D.; BOUTIN, N. Problem-based and project-based learning in engineering and medicine: determinants of students’ engagement and persistence. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, v. 6, n. 2, p. 7-30, 2012.
BEDDOES, K.; JESIEK, B.; BORREGO, M. Identifying opportunities for collaboration in international engineering education research on problem- and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, v. 6, n. 2, p. 7-34, 2010. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1142
BIGGS, J. Teaching for quality learning at university. The society for research into higher education and open university press, Buckingham, 2003.
BOYLE, T.; SCHERRER-RATHJE, M.; STUART, I. Learning to be lean: the influence of external information sources in lean improvements. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, v. 22, n. 5, p. 587–603, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381111134455
CAMPOS, L.; LIMA, R.; ALVES, A.; MESQUITA, D.; MOREIRA, F.; CAMPOS, B. Fatores críticos num processo de aprendizagem baseada em projetos: percepções de estudantes de 1º ano de engenharia, Pontifical Catholic University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2013. Disponível em: https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/30290. Acesso em: 27 julho 2017.
CARVALHO, C.; LOPES, M.; ANTÓNIO, G.; ÁVILA, P.; BASTOS, J.; FONSECA, L. Lean learning academy: na innovative framework for lean manufacturing training. 1st International Conference of the Portuguese Society for Engineering Education (CISPEE), p. 0-4, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISPEE.2013.6701958
CONGER, S.; MILLER, R. Problem-based learning for a lean six sigma course. University of Dallas, USA. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, v.13, n. 1, 2013.
CONGER, S.; MILLER, R. Problem-based learning applied to student consulting in a lean production course. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, v. 14, n. 1, p. 81, 2014.
CUEVAS, J. Is learning styles-based instruction effective? A comprehensive analysis of recent research on learning styles. Theory and Research in Education, v. 13, n. 3, p. 308-333, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878515606621
FANG, N.; COOK, R.; HAUSER, K. Work in progress: an innovative interdisciplinary lean manufacturing course. Frontiers in Education Conference, 36th Annual Conference, IEEE, p. 13-14, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2006.322447
FELDER, R.; BRENT, R. Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, v. 94, n. 1, p. 57-72, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00829.x
FELDER, R.; FELDER, G.; DIEZ, E. A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention versus comparisons with traditionally-taught students. Journal of Engineering Education, v. 87, n. 4, p. 469-480, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00381.x
FELDER, R.; FELDER, G.; DIETZ, E. The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, v. 91, n. 1, p. 3-17, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00667.x
FELDER, R.; SILVERMAN, L. Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, v. 78, n. 7, p. 674-681, 1998.
FELDER, R.; SOLOMAN, B. Index of Learning Styles (ILS). Disponível em: . Acesso em: 5 maio 2016.
FELDER, R.; SPURLIN, J. Applications, reliability and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, v. 21, n. 1, p. 103-112, 2005. Disponível em: https://wss.apan.org/jko/mls/Learning%20Content/ILS_Validation(IJEE).pdf. Acesso em: 27 julho 2017.
FLIEDNER, G.; MATHIESON, K. Learning lean: a survey of industry lean needs. Journal of Education for Business, v. 84, n. 4, p. 194-199, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.4.194-199
FLUMERFELT, S.; KAHLEN, F.; ALVES, A.; SIRIBAN-MANALANG, A. Lean Engineering Education: content and competency mastery, ASME Press, New York, 2014.
FRANCIS, R. Learning styles: key to enhance learning among student teachers of the B. ED course. International Education and Research Journal, v. 2, n. 12, p. 54-55, 2016. Disponível em: http://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/592. Acesso em: 27 julho 2017.
GALAND, B.; FRENAY, M.; RAUCENT, B. Effectiveness of problem-based learning in engineering education: a comparative study on three levels of knowledge structure. International Journal of Engineering Education, v. 28, n. 4, p. 939-947, 2012.
GIJBLES, D.; DOCHY, F.; VAN DEN BOSSCHE, P.; SEGERS, M. Effects of problem-based learning: a meta-analysis from the angle of assessment. Review of Educational Research, v. 75, n. 1, p. 27-61, 2005. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075001027
HALL, A.; HOLLOWAY, L. Application of lean concepts to the teaching of lean manufacturing. 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2008.
HITT, J. Problem-based learning in engineering. Center for teaching excellence, United States Military Academy, West Point, NY, 2010.
HMELO-SILVER, C. Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, v.16, n. 3, p. 235-266, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
HONEY, P.; MUMFORD, A. The learning styles helper ́s guide. Primeira publicação em set. 2000, edição revisada em apr. 2006, Disponível em: .
HONG, J. The comparison of problem-based learning (PmBL) model and project-based learning (PtBL) model. International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEE) 2007, Coimbra, Portugal, 2007. Disponível em: < http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE2007/papers/179.pdf.>. Acesso em: 27 julho 2017.
HUGHES, G. Identifying learning styles: A CPD article improved Grace Hughes’s knowledge of how to identify different learning styles. Nursing Standard, v. 31, n. 16-18, p. 72-73, 2016. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.31.16-18.72.s49
JONES, B.; EPLER, C.; MOKRI, P.; BRYANT, L.; PARETTI, M. The effects of a collaborative problem-based learning experience on students’ motivation in engineering capstone courses. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, v.7, n 2, p. 34-71, 2013. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1344
JOHNSON, S.; GERSTENFELD, A.; ZENG, A.; RAMOS, B.; MISHRA, S. Teaching lean process design using a discovery approach. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, USA, 2003.
KALISKÁ, L. Felder’s Learning Style Concept and its Index of Learning Style Questionnaire in the Slovak Conditions. Grant Journal, v.1, p. 52-56, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.grantjournal.com/issue/0101/PDF/0101kaliska.pdf. Acesso em: 27 julho 2017.
KANIGOLLA, D.; CUDNEY, E.; CORNS, S. Enhancing engineering education using project-based learning for lean and six sigma. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, v. 5, n.1, p. 45-61, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-02-2013-0008
KATSIOLOUDIS, P.; FANTZ, T. A comparative analysis of preferred learning and teaching styles for engineering, industrial, and technology education: students and faculty. Journal of Technology Education, v. 23, n. 2, p. 61-69, 2012. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v23i2.a.4
KETTERING UNIVERSITY. Lean resource center, Disponível em: <https://paws.kettering.edu/~wschelle/Ford_Grad/Ford_Ket.htm>, Acesso em: 20 dez. 2016.
KHATIBI, M.; KHORMAEI, F. Learning and personality: a review. Journal of Educational and Management Studies, v. 6, n. 4, p. 89-97, 2016. Disponível em: < http://jems.science-line.com/attachments/article/40/J.%20Educ.%20Manage.%20Stud.,%206(4)%2089-97,%202016.pdf>. Acesso em: 27 julho 2017.
KOLB, D. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N .J., 1984.
LIKER, J. The Toyota Way: 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2004.
LIKER, J.; MEIER, D. The Toyota Way Field book: a practical guide for implementing Toyota’s 4Ps. McGraw-Hill, New York 2006.
LITZINGER, T. A.; LEE, S. H.; WISE, J. C.; FELDER, R. M. A psychometric study of the index of learning styles©. Journal of Engineering Education, v. 96, n. 4, p. 309, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00941.x
LOBAUGH, M. Lean manufacturing: a unique approach to educating students, v. 10, n. 1, 2005.
MARTENS, I.; COLPAERT, J.; DE BOECK, L. Lean learning academy: an innovative learning concept in engineering curricula. IHEPI 2010 Conference Paper, 2010.
MEYERS, L.; GAMST, G.; GUARINO, A. Applied multivariate research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 2006.
MONTGOMERY, D. Design and analysis of experiments. 8th ed. Wiley, New York, 2013.
MURMAN, E.; MCMANUS, H.; CANDIDO, J. Enhancing faculty competency in lean thinking bodies of knowledge. 3rd International CDIO Conference, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83592
PEDLER, M.; ABBOTT, C. Lean and learning: action learning for service improvement. Leadership in Health Services, v. 21, n. 2, p. 87-98, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511870810870538
PETER, G. Hands-on graduate courses in lean manufacturing (LM) emphasizing green and total productive maintenance (TPM). American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, p. 357-365, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2010-37921
PETERS, F.; POTTER, L.; MIN, K. Developing students’ understanding of global issues through lean manufacturing. 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2008.4720592
PUJI, R.; AHMAD, A. Learning style of MBTI personality types in history learning at higher education. Scientific Journal of PPI-UKM, v. 3, n. 6, p. 289-295, 2016. Disponível em < http://www.kemalapublisher.com/index.php/ppi-ukm/article/view/224>. Acesso em: 27 julho 2017.
RAMSDEN, P. Learning to teach at higher education. Taylor and Francis, London, 2003.
RULTEGDE, S. What do teachers know about differentiated instruction? Tese (Doutorado) - Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Southern University, 2016.
SANTOS, D.; SILVA, C. Evaluation of students’ general perceptions of problem-based learning in a computer engineering program in Brazil. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, v. 68, p. 74-83, 2015.
SEDDON, J.; CAULKIN, S. Systems thinking, lean production and action learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice, v. 4, n.1, p. 9-24, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767330701231438
SHAH, R.; WARD, P. Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, v. 25, n. 4, p. 785-805, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.019
SHEPPARD, S.; MACATANGAY, K.; COLBY, A.; SULLIVAN, W.; SHULMAN, L. Educating engineers: designing for the future of the field. Jossey-Bass, Hoboken, NJ, 2008.
SPEAR, S.; BOWEN, H. Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system. Harvard Business Review, v. 77, p. 96-108, 1999.
TABACHNICK, B.; FIDELL, L. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed., Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2013.
TORRES, P.; STEPHENS, M. Improving production performance through lean manufacturing techniques & education in lean concepts. 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005.
TORTORELLA, G.; FOGLIATTO, F. Method for assessing human resources management practices and organizational learning factors in a company under lean manufacturing implementation. International Journal of Production Research, v. 52, n. 15, p. 4623-4645, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.881577
TORTORELLA, G.; MARODIN, G.; MIORANDO, R.; SEIDEL, A. The impact of contextual variables on learning organization in firms that are implementing lean: a study in Southern Brazil. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, v. 78, n. 9-12, p. 1879-1892, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6791-1
TORTORELLA, G.; VIANA, S.; FETTERMANN, D. Learning cycles and focus groups: A complementary approach to the A3 thinking methodology. The Learning Organization, v. 22, n. 4, p. 229-240, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-02-2015-0008
TOVAR, E.; WARSHAWSKY, N. Use of a problem-based learning exercise to teach the lean 8-step problem-solving method. Nurse Educator, v. 40, n. 2, p. 101-104, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000124
UNIVERSITY Of KENTUCKY. True Lean. Lean Systems Program, Disponível em: <https://www.lean.uky.edu/>, Acesso em: 20 dez. 2016.
VAN TIL, R.; SENGUPTA, S.; FLIEDNER, G.; TRACEY, M.; YAMADA, K. Teaching Lean manufacturing principles using an interdisciplinary project featuring industrial/academic cooperation. Frontiers in Education Conference, v.35, n. 3, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2005.1612258
WAN, H.; LIAO, Y.; KURIGER, G. Redesigning a lean simulation game for more flexibility and higher efficiency. 2012 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2012.
WHITE, H. Problem-based learning. Speaking of Teaching, v.11, n.1, p. 1-7, 2001.
WOMACK, J.; JONES, D. Lean solutions: how companies and customers can create value and wealth together. Simon and Schuster, New York, 2009.
ZHANG, J.; OGAN, A.; LIU, T.; SUNG, Y.; CHANG, K. The influence of using augmented reality on textbook support for learners of different learning styles. Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2016 IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 107-114), IEEE, 2016.
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
A Revista se reserva no direito de efetuar, no artigo publicado, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores.
A obra publicada é de inteira responsabilidade do(s) autor(es), cabendo à Revista Produção Online apenas a avaliação da obra, na qualidade de veículo de publicação científica. A Revista Produção Online não se responsabiliza por eventuais violações à Lei nº 9.610/1998, Lei de Direito Autoral.
A revista Produção Online permite que o autor detenha o copyright dos artigos aceitos para publicação, sem restrições.
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons.
